Eugen Wassiliwziky, Max Planck Institute For Empirical Aesthetics - The Gender Attractiveness Gap

Why do we evaluate male and female beauty differently?

Eugen Wassiliwizky, senior researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Empirical Aesthetics, looks for an answer.

Faculty Bio:

Eugen Wassiliwizky has an interdisciplinary background in neuropsychology, classics, and musicology and has conducted research in Germany, Canada, and Norway. His work examines the neural and evolutionary foundations of aesthetic experience across domains including language, film, music, and facial perception. Alongside his academic research, he has extensive experience as a communication coach, helping researchers, policymakers, and professionals communicate complex ideas clearly and persuasively.

Transcript:

More than 150 years ago, Charles Darwin made an intriguing observation. Unlike many animal species, in which males are the more ornamented sex—think of lions or birds of paradise—he argued that humans are unusual because it is women who are generally regarded as “the beautiful sex.” In other words, the typical pattern of sexual ornamentation appears to be reversed in humans. Surprisingly, however, this idea remained untested for more than a century and a half. Yet the answer had been hiding in scientific data all along.
Together with colleagues, we recently analyzed one of the largest collections of facial-attractiveness data ever assembled: more than 1.5 million ratings from around the globe. The result was remarkably consistent: across cultures, age groups, and sexual orientations, female faces received higher attractiveness ratings than male faces. On average, a female face outranked about 60% of male faces. We call this robust phenomenon the Gender Attractiveness Gap.
The findings also revealed several surprising details. Women showed the strongest preference for female faces, even stronger than men did. Moreover, facial structure explained a substantial part of the effect: differences in facial femininity and masculinity accounted for roughly 40% of the observed GAP. Another unexpected pattern emerged when we looked beyond average ratings. Whereas female attractiveness followed an almost perfectly normal distribution, male faces exhibited a small but distinct group of exceptionally attractive individuals. This raises the intriguing possibility that exceptional male attractiveness occupies a more specialized role than previously assumed.
Rather than closing a chapter, these findings open an entirely new one. Why do humans evaluate female and male beauty so differently? And what do attractiveness ratings actually reveal about the way our minds perceive human beauty? Sometimes important scientific discoveries are not entirely new, they are patterns that have been hiding in plain sight for decades, waiting to be recognized.

Read More:

[The Royal Society Publishing] - The gender attractiveness gap