Membership Programs Meetings Publications Advocacy Press Room About AAC&U
Association of American Colleges and Universities
Search Web Site
AAC&U
Resources on:
Liberal Education
General Education
Curriculum
Faculty
Institutional Change
Assessment
Diversity
Civic Engagement
Science & Health
Women
Global Learning

GENERAL EDUCATION IN AN AGE OF STUDENT MOBILITY

What Do Our Students Value?

by Rod A. Risley

Robert Shoenberg is absolutely right in calling for systemic approaches to defining the purpose and objectives of a general education curriculum. Indeed, such initiatives are decades late in coming. However, if we consider these issues from a student's perspective, we can't help but realize that a major piece of this puzzle is missing, and without it Shoenberg's point is moot.

Educators must understand that students today see themselves as consumers, and they view education as a product. To many, this notion is distasteful. But it is reality. The challenge before us is to not only define objectives and minimum standards for general education but also to offer these consumers a solid rationale as to why a general education has relevance. It is not enough to provide for seamless transfer and a coherent curriculum when the students themselves fail to see the value in general study.

Many students enroll in community colleges not with the thought of purchasing a broadly based education, but rather to register for the minimum number of courses needed to get a better job. They are mesmerized by the salaries commanded in the high-technology arena. Forget general education-they want the bare-bones number of courses that will get them out of college and into the job market as quickly as possible. They are savvy consumers of training and credit, but they are not necessarily well-informed consumers of education.

But who is responsible for making the case as to the purpose, objectives, and value of a general education? Can two-year college administrators take on this role? Not likely-as they come under increasing pressure to provide contract training for local businesses, they've been forced to give higher and higher priority to work-force development.

Our problem demands, I think, the unlikely partnership of faculty members and corporate and public leaders. Given the present dynamics, they are the ones most likely to take an introspective look at the general education curriculum, and they have the most freedom to communicate its value.

Greater Expectations for Student Transfer

IN THIS PUBLICATION

About This Publication
Foreword by George R. Boggs
Foreword by Carol Geary Schneider
PART I: OPINION
Why Do I Have to Take This Course? or Credit Hours, Transfer, and Curricular Coherence by Robert Shoenberg
PART II: CONTINUING THE DISCUSSION
Who Wants Coherence? by Marshall A. Hill
Can We Work with Our Legislatures? by Eduardo Padron
What Do Our Students Value? by Rod A. Risley
Define the Role of State Systems by Martha Romero
Leadership is Essential by Ron Williams
Don't Sacrifice Local Autonomy by John Nixon
Will We Reform Ourselves, or Will It Be Done to Us? by Deborah Floyd
PART III: MORE PERSPECTIVES ON CURRICULAR COHERENCE AND STUDENT TRANSFER
What Do We Know About Transfer? An Overview by James C. Palmer
Accrediting for Curricular Coherence by Carolyn Prager
Lessons from Adult Learning by William H. Maehl