Press Release
Contact: Debra Humphreys
Vice President for Communications and Public Affairs
202-387-3760 ext. 422
Humphreys@aacu.org
Study of Three California Colleges Reveals
That a Sizeable Portion of Students Initially Classified as
“Unknown” in Admissions Data are White
More Students Don’t Identify Their Racial/Ethnic
Background on Applications; New Study Makes Recommendations
for Campus and Federal Actions to Address Growing Trend
Washington, DC—January 4, 2006—A
new report, “‘Unknown’ Students on College
Campuses: An Exploratory Analysis,” was released today
by The James Irvine Foundation. Authors of this study explore
the dramatic increase in the percentage of college students
who do not identify their racial/ethnic background on college
admissions forms. Their study examined this group of students
at three private California colleges and found that a sizeable
portion of them are white. Another large group are multiracial
students who select “white” as part of their racial/ethnic
identification. The report was released as part of The James
Irvine Foundation Campus Diversity Initiative (CDI), coordinated
by the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U)
and the Claremont Graduate University (CGU).
“We are pleased to have supported the
twenty-eight campuses in the Campus Diversity Initiative to
increase the success of underrepresented students in higher
education in California,” said James Canales, president
& chief executive officer of The James Irvine Foundation.
“The results of this particular study should support
efforts to more effectively monitor and describe campus change
with regard to diversity over time.”
The authors, researchers from AAC&U and
CGU, examined two independent data sets. The first set, admissions
data, was converted into enrollment data upon students’
acceptance and matriculation into college. The second set,
CIRP (Cooperative Institutional Research Program) Freshman
Survey data, was gathered after the students were on campus.
While the authors could not compare data at the level of individual
students, they found that comparing students by racial/ethnic
group across the two data sets yielded important information,
especially if the campus experienced high response rates on
the CIRP. With one such campus in the study, for example,
enrollment data indicated white students to be 42% of the
total entering cohort, while CIRP data showed white students
to comprise between 57% and 70% of this same cohort.
“While this study is exploratory, it is
a big first step in isolating and addressing the problems
associated with how campuses and the federal government track
the racial/ethnic background of today’s college students,”
said AAC&U president, Carol Geary Schneider. “Given
what we now know about the educational value of diverse learning
environments, it is more important than ever that we have
an accurate picture of student diversity on our college campuses.
We need to attend to the growing number of students who don’t
identify their racial/ethnic background on admissions forms.
We cannot rely on anecdotes about these students or on assumptions
that they are all multiracial, especially at schools with
highly competitive admissions.”
As the report notes, nationally, the percentage
of individuals in the unknown category has increased nearly
100 percent between 1991 and 2001, from 3.2 percent to 5.9
percent, and on individual campuses, the percentage can be
much higher. This study breaks new ground in devising a method
that can be used to find out more information about the “unknown”
group, though the study does not examine the various reasons
why some students may choose to withhold this identity information.
The report ends with a series of recommendations
to improve data collection and use at both the campus and
federal levels. The authors feel a special sense of urgency
around the growing “unknown” population, particularly
with regard to its potential effects on the compositional
diversity of an institution as well as on the resulting campus
climate. The trend also points to a need for more detailed
collection and more nuanced use of data.
“We must move away from collapsing multiple
groups of students into categories that are not very useful,
including for federal data reporting,” said lead author
Daryl G. Smith, of CGU. “College and university leaders
need to obtain detailed information about students’
racial/ethnic backgrounds in order to know precisely who is—and
who is not—getting into college.”
The James Irvine Foundation established the
CDI in 2000 to help twenty-eight independent colleges and
universities in California strategically address issues of
diversity on their campuses. The six-year initiative supports
a range of campus activities and institutional changes with
the aim of increasing access and success of historically underrepresented
students in higher education. Researchers from CGU and AAC&U
designed and led the CDI Evaluation Project to assist the
campuses in developing their own evaluation expertise and
mechanisms. This report is the first in a series of research
briefs and other reports that will be issued from the project
over the coming year.
To read the entire report online, visit The
James Irvine Foundation Web
site. To read more about the Campus Diversity Initiative,
see AAC&U’s Web site, www.aacu.org/irvinediveval.
AAC&U is the leading national association
concerned with the quality, vitality, and public standing
of undergraduate liberal education. Its members are committed
to extending the advantages of a liberal education to all
students, regardless of academic specialization or intended
career. Founded in 1915, AAC&U now comprises more than
1,000 accredited public and private colleges and universities
of every type and size.
AAC&U functions as a catalyst and facilitator,
forging links among presidents, administrators, and faculty
members who are engaged in institutional and curricular planning.
Its mission is to reinforce the collective commitment to liberal
education at both the national and local levels and to help
individual institutions keep the quality of student learning
at the core of their work as they evolve to meet new economic
and social challenges.
Information about AAC&U membership,
programs, and publications can be found at www.aacu.org.
|