Membership Programs Meetings Publications Advocacy Press Room About AAC&U
Association of American Colleges and Universities
Search Web Site
AAC&U
Resources on:
Liberal Education
General Education
Curriculum
Faculty
Institutional Change
Assessment
Diversity
Civic Engagement
Science & Health
Women
Global Learning

THE PREPARING FUTURE FACULTY PROGRAM: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
by A. Leigh DeNeef

IV. Conclusion
Graduates now serving in administrative positions illustrate the commitment of alumni to promoting continuation of PFF and PFF-type activities. Alumni are grateful to the program for what it gave to them, and they have assumed, perhaps as part of their “service” to the academic profession, the responsibility to give something back. Thus Jason Cody participated in development of the chemistry component through the American Chemical Society program of Preparing Future Faculty, and Jennifer Egert, through participation in the American Psychological Association's (APA) Teaching and Educational Issues workgroup, has now become involved in its leadership of department-based PFF initiatives. Angela Bryan has also assumed a major role in the APA's development of a cross-country collaboration on a PFF program in psychology at Colorado and Yale.

Other alumni are currently involved in what might be called “next generation” professional development projects in higher education. Charles Carter has been selected as a Pew/Carnegie Fellow in their new initiative on the scholarship of teaching and learning. As one of twenty-eight faculty from across the country chosen for this honor, Charles will be conducting a project on the relationship between interdisciplinary studies and multimedia in promoting deeper learning. Jason Cody is now involved in both Project Kaleidoscope and the F21 Network for Science, Mathematics, and Technology educators. The goals of these projects are a research-rich curriculum and continuing innovation in the classroom.

For all of these academics, PFF has not only smoothed the transition between graduate school and their initial academic positions, but it has also brought them into the larger conversation of academic reform generally. At the center of this reform is the effort to create a better and more seamless fit between new Ph.D.s and the faculty roles/tasks they assume as they take their places in the full range of institutions of higher learning. Our alumni all agree that the essential principles of Preparing Future Faculty are ones that need to be promoted and expanded in order to be successful in that effort. As they become active voices in this broader national reform of higher education, there is every reason to expect that the success story of PFF will continue to be written.

Other PFF Occasional Papers

IN THIS PUBLICATION

About This Publication
I. Introduction
II. General Findings from the Survey
III Alumni Narratives: A. Differences PFF made on the research campus
III Alumni Narratives: B. Differences PFF Made in Negotiating the Job Market
III Alumni Narratives: C. Differences PFF Made in the Initial Years in the Academy
IV. Conclusion
Appendix
Table A: PFF “Value” Question Results: Sorted by Mean
Table B: PFF “Value” Question Results: Sorted by Mean (w/out Duke)
Table C: PFF “Value” Question Results: Sorted by Category
Table D: PFF “Value” Question Results: Sorted by Category
Table E: PFF “Value” Question Results: Sorted by % Not Covered
Table F: PFF “Value” Question Mean Results: Sorted by Ethnicity
Table G: PFF “Value” Question Mean Results: Sorted by Discipline

Download PDF (400k)