| What Colleges
and Universities Want in New Faculty
by Kathrynn A. Adams
1. Teaching
Teaching is the responsibility that demands the most immediate attention
and consumes the most time and energy of new faculty (Boice 1992).
Hiring institutions desire that applicants be “teaching ready”
(Benassi 1999). Yet, the teaching preparation of graduate students
is quite varied. Some graduate students have no teaching experience;
others have served as a teaching assistant in a couple of different
courses; some have taught labs or discussion sections; others have
taught a single course; and a few have independently taught several
courses. That only a few graduate students have broad experience
with teaching suggests that graduate programs are not adequately
addressing a major component of faculty work. A national survey
of newly hired faculty and their chairpersons agreed that graduate
programs did not adequately focus on preparation for college teaching
(Seidel, Benassi, and Richards 1998). It is no surprise that the
preparation for teaching is inadequate given that graduate students
in a recent longitudinal study reported they receive mixed messages
regarding the importance of teaching (Austin 2002).
Most new faculty report that they are uneasy with the number of
new class preparations and the variety of courses that they are
required to teach during their first few years (Boice 1992). Regardless
of the type of institution, required liberal and general education
courses make up some portion of the curriculum. It follows that
most faculty are expected to teach in the general education curriculum
that is directed at undergraduates in all disciplines and at varying
levels of time to degree. This expectation often comes as a surprise
to junior faculty who have just spent several years focused on a
narrow niche within one discipline.
In order to best serve the liberal and general curriculum, junior
faculty must understand its philosophical importance to the notion
of the educated person. In addition, recent curricular changes in
undergraduate education include emphasis on multicultural, international,
interdisciplinary, and service learning. New faculty may find that
they are expected to develop, as part of the general education curriculum,
courses that focus on these curricular developments. As an essential
component of their courses, they may also be asked to teach writing
or integrate the use of computers. Yet, these issues and aspects
of teaching are usually ignored in graduate programs.
Most colleges and universities have increased
the emphasis placed on the quality of teaching.
One result is that well-structured lectures
alone no longer meet the criteria for excellent
teaching. Faculty are expected to utilize
creative techniques that effectively engage
students and support learning. Schools expect
faculty to embrace new pedagogies including
the use of technology, collaborative learning,
simulations, and field experiences. Because
students come from a variety of backgrounds,
demonstrate various levels of motivation and
diverse learning styles, and exhibit a wide
assortment of career goals, faculty are expected
to address their multiple needs, without sacrificing
academic rigor. Regardless of the size of
the institution or whether its student body
includes graduate students as well as undergraduates,
teaching often includes the supervision of
practicums, internships, independent studies,
and theses. Doctoral graduate students, however,
are rarely given the opportunity to fine-tune
their teaching skills or to mentor students
in non-classroom endeavors.
Advising is often part of faculty members'
teaching responsibilities. At many small institutions,
this responsibility is not limited to advice
about how to complete a major. Faculty are
expected to have an “open door policy,”
that is, to be available to students on a
regular basis and to welcome students seeking
consultation on issues ranging from class
material to graduate school to home life.
Many new faculty are ill at ease with advising
students about personal issues, and they struggle
with the dilemma of how to limit their time
with students so close to their own age who
seek extended time with them. Even for seasoned
teachers, teaching and advising expectations
can be a heavy load demanding extraordinary
effort from new faculty who have only a small
foundation of experience on which to draw.
Recommendations to Graduate Faculty
Graduate programs must provide their doctoral students with a variety
of teaching experiences and successively more independent teaching
in order to prepare them for academic careers. These experiences
should begin during the first year of graduate school and continue
throughout graduate study.
Students need to be introduced to new pedagogies, becoming involved
with and knowledgeable about such areas as active learning, field-based
learning, diversity, and technology.
Students need more than just the experience of teaching classes.
New teachers also should receive constructive feedback about their
performance and participate in group discussions about creative
teaching possibilities, problem solving, and advising.
The model used for training graduate students in research could
be followed in similarly building graduate students' competence
and confidence in teaching and working with students. As a first
step, departments or graduate schools could offer seminars on teaching.
Later experiences might include supervised teaching, team teaching,
summer school teaching, and teaching fellowships, after the more
typical experience of teaching assistantships and leading lab or
discussion sections.
Faculty identified as outstanding teachers could also mentor individual
or small groups of students as part of their teaching load. One
particularly underutilized source of expertise in this area is faculty
members in other geographically accessible institutions, particularly
those who are recognized as successful teachers and who use innovative
and engaging approaches to teaching and learning. Many such faculty
members do not have the opportunity to work with advanced doctoral
students and would welcome the opportunity, if approached in a sensitive
way.
|