|
|
Online Forum
Quantitative Literacy
Join the discussion. Respond to articles in the current
issue of Peer Review, share your thoughts,
and read what your colleagues are saying about this
topic.
POST A RESPONSE |
November
5, 2004
Tony Griffith, Mathematics Instructor, Westminster School
I agree with the premise, but here is the problem: I teach high school math
at a prep school-- our kids go to the top private colleges in the US - NESCAC
schools, Ivy's, and others. Does the admissions office at Amherst prefer a
kid who can discuss Simpson's Paradox or simplify a rational function?
Does the SAT 2 reward a kid who can understand Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
or factor a cubic function? I teach a course called Discrete Math.
It is a great class! We use Tannenbaum's book.
But--it is for our weakest seniors. Again, Williams and Bowdoin want
conic sections, not Euler circuits.
|
 |
|