Membership Programs Meetings Publications LEAP Press Room About AAC&U
Association of American Colleges and Universities
Search Web Site
AAC&U
Resources on:
Liberal Education
General Education
Curriculum
Faculty
Institutional Change
Assessment
Diversity
Civic Engagement
Science & Health
Women
Global Learning
Learn More:
What's New at AAC&U
AAC&U TV
AAC&U Podcasts
AAC&U Updates
Support AACU
Online Giving Form
 
Publications
 

Online Forum

Quantitative Literacy

Join the discussion. Respond to articles in the current issue of Peer Review, share your thoughts, and read what your colleagues are saying about this topic.

POST A RESPONSE


 

November 5, 2004
Tony Griffith, Mathematics Instructor, Westminster School

I agree with the premise, but here is the problem: I teach high school math at a prep school-- our kids go to the top private colleges in the US - NESCAC schools, Ivy's, and others. Does the admissions office at Amherst prefer a kid who can discuss Simpson's Paradox or simplify a rational function? Does the SAT 2 reward a kid who can understand Arrow's Impossibility Theorem or factor a cubic function? I teach a course called Discrete Math. It is a great class! We use Tannenbaum's book. But--it is for our weakest seniors. Again, Williams and Bowdoin want conic sections, not Euler circuits.

PEER REVIEW LINKS
About Peer Review
Online Forum
Current Issue
Previous Issues
Ordering Information
Permissions
Future Topics
 AAC&U 1818 R Street, NW Washington, DC 20009 202-387-3760 202-265-9532 Fax
 Copyright 2008 All Rights Reserved