|
|
Liberal Education, Summer 2003
From the Editor
Bridget Puzon |
How we learn is a fascinating subject at any time. Many of
us create a working theory about learning from a combination
of available research, reading, and personal experience mulled
over into an explanation all one's own. The current educational
emphasis on learning has contributed to our understanding,
as educators apply theory on learning to practice in the classroom.
Competition for students' attention and new learning modes
surely expand the field for research. With the visual and
aural impact of cable--all sorts of messages, all the time--as
well as the near-limitless resource of the Internet, I can
only speculate on what sort of consciousness students bring
to the classroom and what it takes for the classroom experience
to cut through to enable and support intellectual and ethical
growth.
Watching a child learn to speak has often struck me as watching
the greatest intellectual effort (or accomplishment) anyone
will ever make. Each child must, in a sense, do most of the
work of learning on his or her own, parents and other caregivers
introducing the sounds, referents, and grammatical structures
of language, guiding, encouraging, correcting, and generally
cheerleading the process. The strongest impulse to communicate
rises from within, and each step toward speech has its own
wonder, wresting intelligibility from the flow of
experience. Yet it is only the first step in an intellectual
journey of a lifetime.
Setting aside individually tailored theories, I find that
the research presented by the authors in this issue of the
journal offers a variety of perspectives on learning: its
stages, its inherent value, the need for a context of reflection
and interaction with peers, an analogue in Global Positioning
Systems. Questions about teaching consequentially arise about
readiness to learn and the levels of capability among the
learners in any given class. Now more than ever, it seems,
personal experience of teaching needs the informing power
of cognitive theory to break through "environmental" competitors
from popular culture vying for attention and presenting possible
unwitting barriers to learning.
|
 |
|